She is, in the words of the articles, guilty of “obstruction of Congress.” And unlike President Trump, Speaker Pelosi has no constitutional basis whatsoever for refusing the request of one of the two houses that make up the legislative branch.

For weeks, Democrats have insisted that the president needed to be impeached and removed from office as soon as possible. Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA), in his House Intelligence Committee report, declared: “Given the proximate threat of further presidential attempts to solicit foreign interference in our next election, we cannot wait to make a referral until our efforts to obtain additional testimony and documents wind their way through the courts.”

House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler (D-NY) argued at the December 9 hearing on that report: “We agree that when the elections themselves are threatened by enemies foreign or domestic, we cannot wait until the next election to address the threat.” He made the point again during the House debate on impeachment Wednesday: “The threat is urgent. If we do not act — now — what happens next will be our responsibility as well as his.”

Another Trump’s celebrity supporter, Tim Allen, discussed the hypocrisy of Hollywood liberals, who he noted constantly complained about Trump being a “bully,” but now are the ones doing the bullying of the tiny minority of Trump supporters who work alongside them.

“What I find odd in Hollywood is that they didn’t like Trump because he was a bully. But if you had any kind of inkling that you were for Trump, you got bullied for doing that. And … it gets a little bit hypocritical to me,”

“Sаturdау Nіght At Ilhаn’ѕ! Brіng Your Flаgѕ And Thrоw Thеm Intо The Bonfire! Burgеrѕ, Shаwаrmа, аnd Tеа For All!”

And thеу саmе іn droves. Hundrеdѕ оf Ilhаn Omar’s Dеmосrаt frіеndѕ ѕhоwеd uр аt thе dооr оf hеr palatial еѕtаtе, Amеrісаn flаgѕ in hand, to attend thе “Fіrѕt Annuаl Flаg Dіѕсаrd Bоnfіrе аnd Bаrbеԛuе”. Thе backyard fire wаѕ mаѕѕіvе and іt only grew larger as mоrе аnd mоrе аrrіvеd tо fuеl іt with fаbrіс. Wіth the Stаrѕ аnd Strіреѕ. It wаѕ a disgusting dіѕрlау of absence оf patriotism аnd possible trеаѕоn.

Dаvіd Rоѕnеr wаѕn’t aware оf thе burnіng раrt оf thе party. He оnlу аttеndеd for the promise of ѕhаwаrmа and tаbоulеh, two оf hіѕ fаvоrіtе delectables.

“I gоt there and lоаdеd uр mу рlаtе. Gооd shawarma іѕ hаrd tо fіnd! Fаlаfеl too! And there wаѕ tаbоulеh and hummus and baba ganoush! It was a delicious Middle Eаѕtеrn ѕmоrgаѕbоrd! Absolutely hеаvеnlу! I nеvеr wаntеd tо lеаvе!

Thеrе wеrе a lot оf people сrоwdеd around a fire too. I don’t knоw whаt wаѕ going on there. I ѕtауеd wіth thе yummies.”

At thе соnсluѕіоn оf thе burning fеѕtіvіtіеѕ, Mrs Omar thаnkеd аll fоr attending to рrореrlу dispose оf thеіr old and wоrn flags аnd рrеѕеntеd еасh guеѕt wіth a ѕhіnу, new rерlасеmеnt, nоtіng thаt thеіr раtrіоtіѕm was аррrесіаtеd. Lіkе she knоwѕ whаt раtrіоtіѕm іѕ.

Finnish scientists spearheaded the research, releasing a paper entitled, “No Experimental Evidence for the Significant Anthropogenic Climate Change.”

The paper explains that IPCC analysis of global temperatures suffers from a glaring error — namely, failure to account for “influences of low cloud cover” and how it impacts global temperatures. Natural variations in low cloud cover, which are strongly influenced by cosmic radiation’s ability to penetrate Earth’s atmosphere due to variations in the strength of our planet’s magnetosphere, account for nearly all changes in global temperature, the researchers explain.

As this chart reveals, more cloud cover is inversely related to temperature. In other words, clouds shield the surface of the Earth from the sun, providing shade cover cooling, while a lack of clouds results in more warming:

Cloud cover accounts for the real changes in global temperatures

This is further supported by researchers at Kobe University in Japan who published a nearly simultaneous paper that reveals how changes in our planet’s magnetic field govern the intensity of solar radiation that reaches the lower atmosphere, causing cloud formation that alters global temperatures.

Get more news like this without being censored: Get the Natural News app for your mobile devices. Enjoy uncensored news, lab test results, videos, podcasts and more. Bypass all the unfair censorship by Google, Facebook, YouTube and Twitter. Get your daily news and videos directly from the source!  

That study, published in Nature, is called, “Intensified East Asian winter monsoon during the last geomagnetic reversal transition.” It states:

Records of suborbital-scale climate variation during the last glacial and Holocene periods can be used to elucidate the mechanisms of rapid climate changes… At least one event was associated with a decrease in the strength of the Earth’s magnetic field. Thus, climate records from the MIS 19 interglacial can be used to elucidate the mechanisms of a variety of climate changes, including testing the effect of changes in geomagnetic dipole field strength on climate through galactic cosmic ray (GCR)-induced cloud formation…

In effect, cosmic rays which are normally deflected via the magnetosphere are, in times of weak or changing magnetic fields emanating from Earth itself, able to penetrate further into Earth’s atmosphere, causing the formation of low-level clouds which cover the land in a kind of “umbrella effect” that shades the land from the sun, allowing cooling to take place. But a lack of clouds makes the surface hotter, as would be expected. This natural phenomenon is now documented to be the primary driver of global temperatures and climate, not human activity.

Burn all the oil you want, in other words, and it’s still just a drop in the bucket compared to the power of the sun and other cosmic influences. All the fossil fuel consumption in the world barely contributes anything to actual global temperatures, the researchers confirmed.

As they explain, the IPCC’s climate models are wildly overestimating the influence of carbon dioxide on global temperatures:

…the [IPCC] models fail to derive the influences of low cloud cover fraction on the global temperature. A too small natural component results in a too large portion for the contribution of the greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide. That is why J. KAUPPINEN AND P. MALMI IPCC represents the climate sensitivity more than one order of magnitude larger than our sensitivity 0.24°C. Because the anthropogenic portion in the increased CO2 is less than 10%, we have practically no anthropogenic climate change. The low clouds control mainly the global temperature.

The entire “climate change” hoax is a fraud

Carbon dioxide, in other words, isn’t the “pollutant” that climate change alarmists have long claimed it to be. CO2 won’t destroy the planet and barely has any effect on global temperatures (the IPCC’s estimate of its effect is, according to Finnish researchers, about one order of magnitude too large, or ten times the actual amount).

In fact, NASA was forced to recently admit that carbon dioxide is re-greening the Earth on a massive scale by supporting the growth of rainforests, trees and grasslands. See these maps showing the increase in green plant life, thanks to rising CO2:

Importantly, reducing our global consumption of fossil fuels will have virtually no impact on global temperatures. The far bigger governor of climate and temperatures is the strength and configuration of Earth’s magnetosphere, which has always been in flux since the formation of the planet billions of years ago. The weaker the magnetosphere, the more cosmic rays penetrate the atmosphere, resulting in the generation of clouds, which shield the planet’s surface from the sun. Thus, a weaker magnetosphere causes global cooling, while a stronger magnetosphere results in global warming, according to this research. This phenomenon is called the “Svensmark Effect.”

This suggests that the increase in cosmic rays was accompanied by an increase in low-cloud cover, the umbrella effect of the clouds cooled the continent, and Siberian high atmospheric pressure became stronger. Added to other phenomena during the geomagnetic reversal — evidence of an annual average temperature drop of 2-3 degrees Celsius, and an increase in annual temperature ranges from the sediment in Osaka Bay — this new discovery about winter monsoons provides further proof that the climate changes are caused by the cloud umbrella effect.

The “war on carbon” is derived from sheer stupidity, arrogance and scientific illiteracy

The extreme alarmism of climate change lunatics — best personified by Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’ insistence that humanity will be destroyed in 12 years if we don’t stop burning fossil fuels — is all based on nothing but fearmongering media propaganda and faked science. (The IPCC and NOAA both routinely fudge temperature data to try to create a warming “trend” where none exists.)

It’s all a massive, coordinated fraud, and the mainstream media deliberately lies to the public about climate change to push anti-free market schemes that would destroy the U.S. economy while transferring literally trillions of dollars into the pockets of wealthy globalists as part of a “carbon tax” scheme.

Yet carbon isn’t the problem at all. And the “war on carbon” is a stupid, senseless policy created by idiots, given that humans are carbon-based lifeforms, meaning that any “war on carbon” is a war on humanity.

See more research papers from Jyrki Kauppinen at this link on Researchgate.net. And stay informed by reading Climate.news.

No one saw the funny side of Rich’s tweet about the 10-year-old.

Rich has expressed her regret over the tweet and described her actions as “irresponsible” after declaring that “Barron will be this country’s first homeschool shooter,” in an abhorrent tweet during his father’s inauguration on Friday.

The tweet drew severe backlash on social media, causing the comedian to not only delete the message but also suspend her account.

Returning to the social media site on Monday.

“I sincerely apologize for the insensitive tweet. I deeply regret my actions and offensive words,” she tweeted. “It was inexcusable & I’m so sorry.”

According to reports, the writer’s name did not appear at the end of Saturday night’s show which was hosted by Master of None star Aziz Ansari.

Whatever you make of his dad’s policies and relationship with the truth , the fact is Barron Trump is just a 10 year-old boy.

CLICK TO PLAY

DONALD TRUMP SIGNS ANTI-ABORTION ADVICE LAW IN ONE OF FIRST ACTS

In the wake of Friday’s presidential inauguration, The White House’s ‘first boy’ since JFK junior has been subjected to cruel online taunts and even speculation that he is autistic.

Saturday Night Live writer Katie Rich attracted harsh criticism for a tweet she later deleted which read, “Barron will be this country’s first homeschool shooter.”

Rich’s comment was just one of many singling out the boy, who must now spend the next four years largely scrutinised under the spotlight.

There are a handful of people who know exactly what this is like, and one in particular leaped to Barron’s defense.

Chelsea Clinton took to her social media accounts to express her anger at the abuse levelled at Donald and Melania’s son.

“Barron Trump deserves the chance every child does – to be a kid,” she wrote.

But Pelosi can’t admit defeat. In fact, she seems to be losing her grip.

On live TV, during an interview on Face the Nation, she insulted 63 million Trump voters. How?

Well, Jim Jordan came on the show right after her and let her have it.

From Twitter:

“.@SpeakerPelosi called the President of the United States an “imposter.”

What an insult to the 63 million Americans who voted for President Trump and gave him an Electoral College landslide.”

Wow! Jim Jordan slammed Pelosi’s wild accusation that Trump is an “imposter.”

He said she was insulting the 63 million Americans who gave Trump the Electoral College landslide.

I guess Nancy Pelosi really doesn’t believe in our democracy anymore. How can any honest person say that Trump is an imposter when so many Americans fairly and legally cast their vote for him?

You know who is a real imposter? Someone that tries to undermine our democracy with a sham investigation.

Someone that thinks they can undo an election—and 200 years of democracy—with a bogus circus put on for the fake news.

Pelosi and her Democrats are trying to impeach Trump without presenting one piece of evidence.

Everything they’ve accused Trump of, going back to the Russian hoax, has been proven untrue. Yet they keep doing it.

Her party has been calling for impeachment since day one. Why? Because it appears Pelosi really does think Trump is an imposter.

I guess you can believe anything if you reject the facts and live in a fantasy world.

“She got paid to do that — paid to decimate communities,” blasted the former sitcom star in a rambling YouTube video. “Because they breathe carbon in their air or some horse s–t.”

Barr, 66, fired off multiple obscenities during her 2-minute critique of Ocasio-Cortez — aiming most of the barrage at the Democratic congresswoman’s Green New Deal to combat climate change, as well as her support for socialism.

“It’s a f–king Ponzi scheme and a con game,” Barr said, calling Ocasio-Cortez a “bug-eyed bitch who looks like a realtor.”

“Lefty dumb-asses,” the TV star added, seemingly referencing AOC’s large following. “Dumb as they get.”

Roseanne Barr is apparently not a fan of Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez — calling her a “Farrakhan-loving…bug-eyed bitch” who is costing “hundreds of people decent-paying jobs” with her so-called Green New Deal.

“She got paid to do that — paid to decimate communities,” blasted the former sitcom star in a rambling YouTube video. “Because they breathe carbon in their air or some horse s–t.”

Barr, 66, fired off multiple obscenities during her 2-minute critique of Ocasio-Cortez — aiming most of the barrage at the Democratic congresswoman’s Green New Deal to combat climate change, as well as her support for socialism.

“It’s a f–king Ponzi scheme and a con game,” Barr said, calling Ocasio-Cortez a “bug-eyed bitch who looks like a realtor.”

“Lefty dumb-asses,” the TV star added, seemingly referencing AOC’s large following. “Dumb as they get.”

“It’s really a matter of putting public pressure on the president,” Suozzi said in a newly released video of the March 12 talk in Huntington. “This is where the Second Amendment comes in, quite frankly, because you know, what if the president was to ignore the courts? What would you do? What would we do?”

A listener then blurts out, “What’s the Second Amendment?”

The left-leaning Democrat says, “The Second Amendment is the right to bear arms.

First time I read about this, I thought maybe Suozzi was joking. Apparently not.

Suozzi political adviser Kim Devlin denied the pol was “advocating for an armed insurrection.”

But the Suozzi campaign at the same time seemed to double down on the comments, as they forwarded a line penned by Thomas Jefferson that called for armed resistance.

“What country can preserve its liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance. Let them take arms,” the quote said.

The idea that the Second Amendment is intended to preserve the right of the people to undertake a violent revolution against some present or future “tyrannical” government is dangerously common on the political right. It’s usually articulated by those who oppose any firearm regulations whatsoever. But at a deeper level, the availability of
“Second Amendment remedies” is the foundation stone of the militia movement, and represents a not-very-subtle threat from anti-democratic (not to mention anti-Democratic) activists of all sorts that there are rights — ranging from property rights to the so-called right to life of the unborn — that no popular majority will be allowed to violate perpetually without provoking righteous violence. This Second
Amendment–based right of revolution was embraced by 2016 Republican presidential candidates Ben Carson, Ted Cruz, and Mike Huckabee.

This sort of loose talk has largely been accepted as part of conventional conservative politics, though Donald Trump did raise some eyebrows during the 2016 general election by hinting that he might share it:

Repeating his contention that Mrs. Clinton wanted to abolish the right to bear arms, Mr. Trump warned at a rally here that it would be “a horrible day” if Mrs. Clinton were elected and got to appoint a tiebreaking Supreme Court justice.

“If she gets to pick her judges, nothing you can do, folks,” Mr. Trump said, as the crowd began to boo. He quickly added: “Although the Second Amendment people — maybe there is, I don’t know.”

So Suozzi is in some pretty strange company in adopting the Second Amendment remedies meme, including, perhaps, the man whose threats to the Constitution apparently pushed him in this direction in the first place.

I’m sure Suozzi will issue a “clarification” before the sun sets tonight. But his remarks should serve as an opportunity for left-of-center folk to swear off similar thinking once and for all. There are few things more frightening than the possibility that participants in today’s hyperpolarized partisan politics will all get into the habit of threatening to take up shooting irons to redress the imperfections of our political system. Progressives would be well-advised to leave this sort of extremist reasoning to the gun nuts and the wing nuts.

He agreed with Joy Behar that Trump was a nasty man and that his family is a bunch of gangsters and went on to say that he would disown his kids if they acted like President Trump’s children.

“I don’t want my kids to take this the wrong way, but if my kids did what these kids did, I wouldn’t want to be related to them,” De Niro star said today on “The View.”

Mgid

Top 10 Irresistible Beauties From Asia
“I would disown them,” the father of six added. “I’d have a serious talk with them. First of all, it’s an impossibility, my kids are not like that, of course.”

Weird for Robert to attack Trump’s kids for doing what exactly? Ivanka just pushed through paid family leave which has long been a Dem dream.

Don Trump Jr and Eric have continued to run the Trump family business while helping campaign for their father all the while avoiding any whiff of scandal.

In fact, the liberal media used to gush over Trump’s kids because they all avoided the trap of coming from a rich and famous family – drug addiction caused by too much money and too much time on the hands.

Trump put his kids to work at an early age and it shows.

From The Hill:

De Niro, asked by “View” co-host Whoopi Goldberg if he had been watching the impeachment proceedings against Trump in the House, replied, “I think no matter what happens — which we know probably in the Senate he won’t get convicted or whatever — but we have to do this.”

The 76-year-old actor, one of the Trump’s most vocal Hollywood critics, continued, “We have to go through the motions. Symbolically, it means something. It’s a taint on his presidency. More than a taint, it’s a stain — one that he deeply deserves.”

“He has to take the punishment. He has to pay the consequences,” De Niro said of Trump…

… Asked by co-host Abby Huntsman Monday if Democrats should forge ahead with impeachment “even if that means it could risk Republicans winning in the election” next year, De Niro said the proceedings should continue despite any political consequences.

“We don’t have time for that. He did something wrong,” De Niro said. “He has to pay for it. Period.”

“He has to pay the consequences.”

Actor Robert De Niro speaks out on the impeachment inquiry of Pres. Trump: “He did something wrong. He has to pay for it — period.” https://t.co/f8u2wc159S pic.twitter.com/JoBdYa4FWM

— The View (@TheView) December 16, 2019